Featured Researcher
Interview with Prof. Lee Eng Hin

 |
 |
1) What attracted you to a career in biology/medicine? |
 |
 |
| |
I was fortunate to have very good biology teachers in my high school. They made the subject
extremely interesting and we had many opportunities to have hands-on learning activities on
plants and animals. My firm grounding in the biological sciences and my positive experiences
with a very caring family doctor who looked after my family and I in my childhood inspired me
to take up a career in medicine. I was not particularly healthy in those days, and my mother
had to take me to see him quite regularly for repetitive episodes of coughs and allergies.
In retrospect, I think I was asthmatic as a child, although I was labeled as suffering from
bronchitis. Later in my childhood and early adulthood, I read and heard stories about Albert
Schweitzer in Africa and Norman Bethune in China, and I was impressed by their selfless devotion
to the care of the sick and less fortunate in under-developed and developing countries. I felt
that as a doctor I would have the opportunity to help a lot of people in this way.
|


 |
 |
Which scientist/clinician has made the biggest impact in your field? |
 |
 |
| |
Over the years apart from clinical research, my main areas of research have been in Gait Analysis
and Tissue Engineering. In Gait Analysis one name stands out: the late Dr David Sutherland from San
Diego, who is acknowledged as the pioneer of gait analysis in children. His whole life was devoted
to the then very new field of Gait Analysis using a computer-based opto-electronic system. He was
best known for his work on the development of normal gait in children as well as the characterization
of abnormal gait patterns in neuromuscular disease. In the field of Tissue Engineering, the Vacanti
brothers (Joseph, Martin Charles and Francis), and Dr Arnold Caplan are the names that come to mind.
However, even prior to the establishment of the field of Tissue Engineering, we must not forget the
work of Dr Marshall Urist, who discovered the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) back in 1965, one of
the first growth factors found to have a profound impact on bone and cartilage. Arising from the
influence of work done by these giants, my research team has been concentrating on the study of the
biology and behavior of the bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and the molecular
mechanisms involved in repair and regeneration of musculoskeletal tissues, especially cartilage.
This fascinating field will hopefully result in our ability to repair damaged or diseased articular
and physeal cartilage in the near future.
|

 |
 |
What paper had the most influence on you? |
 |
 |
| |
One paper that impressed me a lot when I was training to become an orthopaedic surgeon was the
classic description of a new operation to treat dislocated hips in children by Dr Robert Salter
from Toronto. He devised an operation known as the Innominate Osteotomy based on studies of animal
and human pelvic bone and hip joints. I was awed by the fact that at the age of 36 years he was
able to design a new operation that has stood the test of time and is still universally accepted
as the gold standard for treatment of Developmental Dislocation of the Hip.
|

 |
 |
What's the best advice you ever had? |
 |
 |
| |
I suppose the best advice I have had came from my parents and that is to believe in oneself and to
always try to do the right thing and help others. It is important not to be swayed easily and to
think rationally before acting or reacting. This is not always easy but it is crucial to try know
your one’s abilities and understand oneself before one can interact in a positive way with others.
I have always tried to think of the welfare of others and have tried very hard to be supportive
and fair to all my colleagues and friends. |

 |
 |
What's the worst advice you ever had? |
 |
 |
| |
I can’t think of any particularly bad advice. I guess I must have been lucky to have good friends,
mentors and advisors.
|

 |
 |
What was your biggest thrill in the laboratory/clinic? |
 |
 |
| |
The biggest thrill in the laboratory is when the experiments are going well. This usually leads to a
feeling of exhilaration and excitement in the research team. It is especially thrilling to obtain
significant results from the hard work which we can then see in print in international refereed journals.
The biggest thrill in the clinic is when patients thank you for what you have done for them. There was
one occasion when one of my patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (brittle bones) wrote about his life
in a book and thanked me for giving him the opportunity to walk after performing surgery on his crooked
lower limbs.
|

 |
 |
What are the main issues confronting stem cell researchers with respect to clinical applications of stem cell? |
 |
 |
| |
To put this in perspective, we must appreciate that there are different types of stem cells. The Haemopoeitic
Stem Cells (HSCs) derived from bone marrow or cord blood are now used routinely to treat blood diseases such
as leukaemia, thalasaemia and multiple myeloma. Adult stem cells such as Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) derived
from bone marrow, fat and other sources are now undergoing clinical trials for repair of certain tissues such
as damaged cardiac muscles and cartilage. On the other hand, it will be a while before Embryonic Stem Cells
(ESCs) can be taken to the clinic. The main issues have to do with scientific considerations such as
immunogenicity of the cells and the ability to control the cells so that they do not divide uncontrollably
and become cancerous. The other consideration for ESCs is the ethical issue which may vary from country to
country. It is important that all ESCs that are going to be used in a clinical situation must be derived and
grown under conditions that will allow them to be used in humans. I was thrilled to see the recent write-up in
Nature that our own Singapore stem cell company, ESI, has produced hESC lines that are of clinical grade. This
is a real breakthrough for ESC research.
|

 |
 |
What is the biggest threat to stem cell research? |
 |
 |
| |
I would not call this a threat as much as trying to win the support of people through education and dialogue.
It is important that everyone understands the challenges involved in stem cell research as outlined above
but also realize that the potential benefits are tremendous. Of course the scientists involved with stem
cell research must conduct their research with integrity and win the support of the public. Scientific
issues can be overcome but a positive public perception and support is essential. At the end of the day,
scientists and doctors will have to find a safe and effective way to use stem cells for treatment of
various diseases that have hitherto been incurable by conventional means.
|
|